• Home
  • About us
  • Guestbook
  • Adorno Studies Journal
  • Next Meeting (2025)

The Association for Adorno Studies

The Association for Adorno Studies

Category Archives: General

Thanks–

03 Wednesday Mar 2021

Posted by Martin Shuster in Association for Adorno Studies, General

≈ Leave a comment

Henry Pickford and the Association presenting us with a framed version of the first issue of Adorno Studies at the annual meeting at Duke University in 2017.

This isn’t a strictly Adorno related announcement but has more to do with the administration of the website and the future of the society. After almost a decade of administering the website (our first post was 12/5/11, which now seems like a lifetime ago!), and of 4 years of editing the journal, Kathy and I are writing to let everyone know that we will be stepping down in these roles.

We are both exceedingly grateful to the community that has arisen and so incredibly happy to have met all of the people we have met across the world, but, for both of us, it is time to step away and allow the association and the website to take on new forms and projects. As of now, as the executives of the Association, Surti Singh and Pierre-François Noppen will take over administration of this site.

In the near future, we anticipate that they will be able to announce new ventures and partnerships for both the association and journal. In the meantime, we send everyone reading best wishes and gratitude.

Most sincerely,

Martin Shuster

Kathy Kiloh

New book: Spectacular Logic in Hegel and Debord: Why Everything is as it Seems

02 Tuesday Mar 2021

Posted by Martin Shuster in Critical Theory, Frankfurt School, General, Publications

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Debord, Hegel

Eric-John Russell (Département de Philosophie at the University of Paris 8) has written to us about his new book: Spectacular Logic in Hegel and Debord: Why Everything is as it Seems (Bloomsbury, 2021), with a foreword by Étienne Balibar.

He notes that “while the monograph is primarily engaged with the work of Guy Debord and Hegelian philosophy, a central argument is that Debord’s work ought to be situated within the legacy of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, particularly Adorno.” And he also notes that there is also a free widget preview available for both the book’s introduction and Étienne Balibar’s foreword: https://bloomsburycp3.codemantra.com/viewer/6038b8f8e21b8400014cc099

Finally, this flyer will give you 35% off of the book.

Spectacular-Logic-in-Hegel-and-Debord-pre-order-flyerDownload

Announcing New and Forthcoming Issues of New German Critique

19 Friday Feb 2021

Posted by Kathy in General, Publications, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

We look forward to the forthcoming Special Issue of New German Critique marking the 50th Anniversary of Aesthetic Theory. “Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory at Fifty” (NGC #143) is edited by Peter E. Gordon (Harvard University) and will feature essays by Eva Geulen, Max Pensky, Hent de Vries, Martin Jay, Sherry Lee, J. M. Bernstein, Ricardo Samaniego de la Fuente, and Mikko Immanen.

From New German Critique:

“It has been fifty years since Theodor Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory was first published in 1970. The work appeared at an historical moment when political tension on the left was at its height, and when the modernist approaches its author championed were being eclipsed by competing movements associated with the 1970s, such as pop art and postmodernism. The initial resistance to Adorno’s major work created a legacy of misunderstandings, and even today, a proper reckoning with Aesthetic Theory in all of its dialectical complexity remains an ongoing and collective effort. This special issue of New German Critique originated in a series of lectures on Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory held at Harvard University during the spring of 2019.”

The current issue (#142, February 2021) also includes essays that will be of interest to Adorno scholars. http://ngc.arts.cornell.edu/current.html

A more fulsome description of the current issue from the journal:

“NGC #142 features a broad range of exciting essays on Adorno, Lessing, Kafka, interwar socialist literature, and the concept of Leitkultur. On Adorno: Lydia Goehr’s contribution explores Adorno’s references to J.S. Bach in order to illuminate Adorno’s “critical theory of possibility,” and Kylie Gilchrist’s essay examines whether and how Adorno could critique advanced capitalist societies for their dehumanizing tendencies while at the same time refusing to define the human. Andrea Gyenge argues that the figure of the mouth in Lessing’s famous study of Laocoön tests the limits of eighteenth-century neoclassicism. Marit Grøtta’s essay examines the intertextual archive of Kafka’s Der Verschollene, bringing into play the hitherto overlooked nature theater movement of the early twentieth century. On interwar socialist literature: Sabine Hake’s contribution studies the writings of the largely forgotten August Winnig, and Christoph Schaub’s article explores how the world literature of socialist internationalism was imagined and practiced in the aftermath of World War I. Finally, Jana Cattien’s article interrogates Leitkultur discourse in contemporary Germany, aiming to expose how Germany’s colonial legacy simultaneously underpins that discourse while remaining hidden from it.

Lydia Goehr’s “Did Bach Compose Musical Works? Thinking with Adorno through Paradigms of Possibility,” will be available online without charge through May 2021 from Duke University Press.

The Adorno and Identity Seminars

14 Thursday Jan 2021

Posted by Martin Shuster in Adorno in Context, Conference, Frankfurt School, General, Links of Interest, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Jon Catlin, Fumi Okiji, and Eric Oberle have written to us asking us to post about a series of seminars they will be curating around Adorno and Identity. More details are below:

Facebook event: https://www.facebook.com/events/689345985085105

Negative dialectics, the critical theorist Theodor Adorno wrote, “is suspicious of all identity.” The concept of identity and its negations—nonidentity and negative identity—are woven throughout Adorno’s wide-ranging corpus. This interdisciplinary series of virtual seminars on “Adorno and Identity,” convened by Jonathon Catlin (Princeton), Eric Oberle (Arizona State), and Fumi Okiji (Berkeley), revisits Adorno’s thought at a moment in which political, cultural, legal, and psychological notions of identity have expanded relevance and vexed public meaning. Across these sessions, scholars from diverse fields will return to Adorno’s theoretical framework in order to collectively develop more robust notions of identity, nonidentity, and negative identity, and to advance critical theory by connecting Adorno’s work to broader conversations about identity in adjacent fields, including the study of race, gender, sexuality, and technology.

This series of virtual seminars will meet on Zoom every two weeks over the course of the spring 2021 semester, beginning Friday, Jan. 29 (1–3pm Eastern US time). Each session will consist of two parts: three presentations of approximately 15 minutes each, followed by an hour of discussion amongst the participants and a public audience. On our Facebook event page you will find our current schedule. Please email jonathon.catlin@gmail.com to be kept up to date with sessions through our email list. A Zoom link and outlines of the presentations will be provided on our website prior to the first session.

Current schedule:

Introduction to Adorno and Identity: Adorno, Du Bois, and negative identity (Jan. 29, 2021, 1–3pm EST)
Jonathon Catlin, Eric Oberle, and Fumi Okiji

Rethinking Adorno and race, part 1: Revisiting Du Bois and critical race theory (Feb. 12)
Corey D. B. Walker – “The Wound of Blackness: Thinking Adorno and the Limits of Critical Theory”
Oshrat Silberbusch – “‘The World Thus Darkly Through the Veil’: Reflections on Identity (Thinking) with Du Bois and Adorno”
Charlotte Baumann – Adorno, Suffering & Critical Race Theory: Or, The Non-identical & the System

Rethinking Adorno and Race, part 2: Freedom through fugitivity and negation (Feb. 26)
Henrike Kohpeiß – “Identity Produced by Negation: Freedom after Theodor Adorno and Saidiya Hartman”
Romy Opperman – “Critical Black Feminist Theory”
Anders Bartonek – “Marronage and Non-identity”

Rethinking Adorno and race, part 3: Fanon, racisms, and the question of praxis (March 12)
Martin Shuster – “Adorno and Fanon on Antisemitism”Sid Simpson and Ryan Curnow – “Stripping Away the Masks of Identity: Adorno and Fanon’s Negative Dialectics”

Adorno and the politics of non-identity (March 26)
Frank Müller – “Reflections on the Politics of Nonidentity”
Ariane Mintz – “Unveiling the ‘Individualistic Veil’: On Narcissistic Reactions to Capitalist Mutilations”
Claudia Leeb – “The Feminist Subject-in-Outline’s Fight against the Extremist Right”

Adorno and queer dis/identification (April 9)
Asaf Angermann – “Queer Utopia and the Incommensurable: Adorno after Muñoz”
Kyle Kaplan – “Dear Adorno: On the Limits of Personal and Practical Advice”
Nicole Yokum – “The Politics of Avoidance: From Adornian Coldness to Edelmanian Antisociality”

Identity thinking, data, and the politics of algorithmic personalization (April 23)
Moira Weigel – An Adornian critique of algorithmic identity, machine learning, and personalization
Jerome Clarke – “Battle of Negroes in a Black Box: Nonidentity and Race Data”
Samir Gandesha – “Adorno’s Critique of Identity Thinking: Between the Abstract and Concrete”

Nietzsche and Adorno on Philosophical Praxis, Language, and Reconciliation: Towards an Ethics of Thinking

31 Thursday Dec 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in General, Links of Interest, Publications, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Paolo A. Bolaños has written to us about his recent new book, Nietzsche and Adorno on Philosophical Praxis, Language, and Reconciliation: Towards an Ethics of Thinking, to be published by Rowman & Littlefield shortly. Here is the publisher’s description:


Nietzsche and Adorno on Philosophical Praxis, Language, and Reconciliation: Towards an Ethics of Thinking
 offers a philosophical notion of an “ethics of thinking,” a kind of thinking that is receptive to the non-identical character of the world of human and non-human objects. Paolo A. Bolaños experiments with the ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche and Theodor W. Adorno, who are presented as contemporary proponents of the Frühromantik tradition. Bolaños offers a reconstruction of the respective philosophies of language of Nietzsche and Adorno, as well as a rehearsal of their critique of metaphysics and identity thinking, in order to develop a notion of philosophical praxis that is grounded in the ethical dimension of thinking. Via Nietzsche and Adorno, Bolaños argues that thinking’s performative participation in uncertainty broadens the domain of reason, thereby also broadening our conceptual capacities and our receptivity to new possibilities of thinking. As an ethical praxis, thinking guards itself from the error of solidification, thereby opening philosophy to a reconciliatory, as opposed to domineering, reception of the world.

Institute for Advanced Dialectical Research

31 Thursday Dec 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in General, Links of Interest

≈ Leave a comment

Moira MacKenzie, the communications coordinator for the newly established Institute for Advanced Dialectic Research wrote to us with the following press release:

Thinking Positively about the Power of Negative Thinking
World’s first Dialectical Research Institute Established on World Philosophy Day

SEATTLE, Washington — Philosopher Herbert Marcuse described dialectic as “the power of negative thinking,” but that hasn’t stopped the founders of the newly-established Institute for Advanced Dialectical Research from thinking positively about their new endeavor. They chose World Philosophy Day (Nov. 19) during a worldwide pandemic to launch the world’s first institute dedicated to dialectical thinking … and they think the timing couldn’t be better.

“One thing we’ve learned from the response to the is that we aren’t limited to interacting with people locally or at big conferences in far-away places,” says Jersey Flight, the institute’s Director of Interdisciplinary Research. Discussion groups, book clubs, lectures, even those big conferences, he notes, have all moved online. “Connecting from quarantine has taught us that distance is no longer a barrier to intellectual engagement and collaboration, whether it’s with people in our own neighborhoods or in other countries around the world.” Dealing with the virus has been challenging for everyone, Flight says, “but it has also created unexpected opportunities for forging fruitful partnerships and developing dialectical thinking.”

Dialectic is one of the oldest branches of philosophy—with roots in ancient Greece, China and India—but its modern form begins with the 19th century German philosopher, G.W.F. Hegel, who showed how our thoughts and experience can develop through a process of contradiction and negation that leads to higher levels of thinking and awareness.

“Dialectic is relevant in a surprisingly wide variety of fields,” says Executive Director, Justin Burke, DPhil, “from philosophy and psychology to physics and linguistics, but it’s rarely studied in its own right.” Dr. Burke, who did his doctoral research on Hegel at Oxford, recalls, “As a student, I used to think of dialectic in purely philosophical terms, but I’ve come to understand what Hegel meant when he said it’s all around us.”

Several years ago, after a lecture, someone in the audience asked Dr. Burke about Hegel and Martin Luther King. “I had to admit I wasn’t aware of a link between them,” he says. “Later, I was surprised to find that Dr. King had written about Hegel and dialectic in his autobiography.” And King wasn’t the only one—Dr. Burke says he discovered that Nobel Prize-winning physicists have written about dialectic: Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli and Werner Heisenberg; there are dialectical biologists, psychologists and sociologists; there is a journal of Dialectical Anthropology; there are emerging fields of dialect, such as neurodialectics and dialectical linguistics. There are also established disciplines, such as dialectical education and Critical Theory, plus non-western traditions, including Chinese, Indian and Russian dialectics. Considered as a group, Dr. Burke says, “There are dozens of potential areas ripe for research and, hopefully, the propagation of dialectical thinking.”

To carry out this research, the institute has established an international forum—the first of its kind—for discussion and debate about dialectic under headings such as “Hegelian Dialectics”, “Quantum Mechanics” and “Dialectical Psychology”. In another first, the institute has also launched a journal of dialectical research, and will organize an annual symposium on dialectic.

Under the Dome: Paul Celan at 100

16 Monday Nov 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in Conference, Critical Theory, General, Links of Interest

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Critical Theory, Paul Celan

Robert Kaufman wrote to us about this event on 11/23/20 at 6pm (PCT). Featuring Judith Butler, Mary Ann Caws, Norma Cole, Jean Daive, Philip Gerard, Fady Joudah, Myung Mi Kim, D.S. Marriott, Michael Palmer, Doris Salcedo, Timothy Snyder, Roberto Tejada, Rosmarie Waldrop, and Raúl Zurita, and moderated by Robert Kaufman.

Click here for more details.

Minima Moralia Today @ Brandeis

16 Monday Sep 2019

Posted by Martin Shuster in Conference, Frankfurt School, General, Links of Interest, Theodor W. Adorno, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Brandeis University

Perhaps this symposium will be of interest to our readers. It is on September 20, 2019 at Brandeis University.

The year 2019 marks the 50th anniversary of the death of the renowned critical theorist Theodor Adorno. To mark his passing, this symposium will reflect on, engage with, and theorize about the lasting impact of his work. In particular, this symposium takes as its core text Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life, a philosophical touchstone for the latter half of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty first. The symposium will investigate the ways that Adorno’s reflections address the damages of contemporary life and/or conceptions of that damaged life.

New Book: Eric Oberle, Theodor Adorno and the Century of Negative Identity

04 Tuesday Sep 2018

Posted by Martin Shuster in Critical Theory, Frankfurt School, General, Publications, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Eric Fromm, Eric Oberle, Identity, Non-Identity

Eric Oberle (Arizona State University) has written to us informing us of the publication of his new book, Theodor Adorno and the Century of Negative Identity (Stanford University Press, 2018). Here is the publisher’s blurb:

Identity has become a central feature of national conversations: identity politics and identity crises are the order of the day. We celebrate identity when it comes to personal freedom and group membership, and we fear the power of identity when it comes to discrimination, bias, and hate crimes. Drawing on Isaiah Berlin’s famous distinction between positive and negative liberty, Theodor Adorno and the Century of Negative Identity argues for the necessity of acknowledging a dialectic within the identity concept. Exploring the intellectual history of identity as a social idea, Eric Oberle shows the philosophical importance of identity’s origins in American exile from Hitler’s fascism. Positive identity was first proposed by Frankfurt School member Erich Fromm, while negative identity was almost immediately put forth as a counter-concept by Fromm’s colleague, Theodor Adorno. Oberle explains why, in the context of the racism, authoritarianism, and the hard-right agitation of the 1940s, the invention of a positive concept of identity required a theory of negative identity. This history in turn reveals how autonomy and objectivity can be recovered within a modern identity structured by domination, alterity, ontologized conflict, and victim blaming.

 

The Frankfurt School Knew Trump Was Coming

21 Wednesday Dec 2016

Posted by Martin Shuster in Adorno in Context, Frankfurt School, General, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

American fascism, Donald J. Trump, Theodor W. Adorno, Thomas Mann

Alex Ross has a piece in the New Yorker that should be of interest to many.

[Adorno’s] moment of vindication is arriving now. With the election of Donald Trump, the latent threat of American authoritarianism is on the verge of being realized, its characteristics already mapped by latter-day sociologists who have updated Adorno’s “F-scale” for fascist tendencies. […] As early as the forties, Adorno saw American life as a kind of reality show: “Men are reduced to walk-on parts in a monster documentary film which has no spectators, since the least of them has his bit to do on the screen.” Now a businessman turned reality-show star has been elected President. Like it or not, Trump is as much a pop-culture phenomenon as he is a political one.

← Older posts

Categories

  • Adorno in Context
  • Adorno Studies (journal)
  • Association for Adorno Studies
  • Call for Papers
  • Conference
  • Conference Summary
  • Critical Theory
  • Frankfurt School
  • General
  • Interviews
  • Links of Interest
  • Publications
  • Theodor W. Adorno
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • January 2024
  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • August 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • March 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • August 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • November 2012
  • July 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
The Association for Adorno Studies gratefully acknowledges the support of the Institute for the Humanities at Simon Fraser University.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.