• Home
  • About us
  • Guestbook
  • Adorno Studies Journal
  • Next Meeting (2025)

The Association for Adorno Studies

The Association for Adorno Studies

Author Archives: Martin Shuster

Thanks–

03 Wednesday Mar 2021

Posted by Martin Shuster in Association for Adorno Studies, General

≈ Leave a comment

Henry Pickford and the Association presenting us with a framed version of the first issue of Adorno Studies at the annual meeting at Duke University in 2017.

This isn’t a strictly Adorno related announcement but has more to do with the administration of the website and the future of the society. After almost a decade of administering the website (our first post was 12/5/11, which now seems like a lifetime ago!), and of 4 years of editing the journal, Kathy and I are writing to let everyone know that we will be stepping down in these roles.

We are both exceedingly grateful to the community that has arisen and so incredibly happy to have met all of the people we have met across the world, but, for both of us, it is time to step away and allow the association and the website to take on new forms and projects. As of now, as the executives of the Association, Surti Singh and Pierre-François Noppen will take over administration of this site.

In the near future, we anticipate that they will be able to announce new ventures and partnerships for both the association and journal. In the meantime, we send everyone reading best wishes and gratitude.

Most sincerely,

Martin Shuster

Kathy Kiloh

New book: Spectacular Logic in Hegel and Debord: Why Everything is as it Seems

02 Tuesday Mar 2021

Posted by Martin Shuster in Critical Theory, Frankfurt School, General, Publications

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Debord, Hegel

Eric-John Russell (Département de Philosophie at the University of Paris 8) has written to us about his new book: Spectacular Logic in Hegel and Debord: Why Everything is as it Seems (Bloomsbury, 2021), with a foreword by Étienne Balibar.

He notes that “while the monograph is primarily engaged with the work of Guy Debord and Hegelian philosophy, a central argument is that Debord’s work ought to be situated within the legacy of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, particularly Adorno.” And he also notes that there is also a free widget preview available for both the book’s introduction and Étienne Balibar’s foreword: https://bloomsburycp3.codemantra.com/viewer/6038b8f8e21b8400014cc099

Finally, this flyer will give you 35% off of the book.

Spectacular-Logic-in-Hegel-and-Debord-pre-order-flyerDownload

New Book: Adorno and the Ban on Images

02 Tuesday Mar 2021

Posted by Martin Shuster in Critical Theory, Frankfurt School, Links of Interest, Publications, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ban, Materialism

UPDATE:

You are cordially invited to the virtual launch of Adorno and the Ban on Images. The author will be in conversation with Dr Cat Moir (Germanic Studies, Sydney).

The launch will take place as part of KCL’s Comparative Literature research seminar series via MS Teams on Wednesday 3 March 2021 at 4.30 pm GMT. The event is free, open to all and can be accessed here (alternatively copy the following link into your browser: https://tinyurl.com/1u30bmtp.) There is no need to pre-register.

Discount codes to purchase the book at a reduced cost (-35%) will be available on the day. In case of interest, the book can be purchased here.

For further information, please contact the organisers: anna.katila@kcl.ac.uk or maria.marino@kcl.ac.uk.

—

Sebastian Truskolaski has written to us letting us know that his new book, Adorno and the Ban on Images, will be released shortly with Bloomsbury. Here is the publisher’s blurb:

This book upends some of the myths that have come to surround the work of the philosopher Theodor W. Adorno – not least amongst them, his supposed fatalism. 

Sebastian Truskolaski argues that Adorno’s writings allow us to address what is arguably the central challenge of modern philosophy: how to picture a world beyond suffering and injustice without, at the same time, betraying its vital impulse. By re-appraising Adorno’s writings on politics, philosophy, and art, this book reconstructs this notoriously difficult author’s overall project from a radically new perspective (Adorno’s famous ‘standpoint of redemption’), and brings his central concerns to bear on the problems of today.

On the one hand, this means reading Adorno alongside his principal interlocutors (including Kant, Marx and Benjamin). On the other hand, it means asking how his secular brand of social criticism can serve to safeguard the image of a better world – above all, when the invocation of this image occurs alongside Adorno’s recurrent reference to the Old Testament ban on making images of God.

By reading Adorno in this iconoclastic way, Adorno and the Ban on Images contributes to current debates about Utopia that have come to define political visions across the political spectrum.

The Adorno and Identity Seminars

14 Thursday Jan 2021

Posted by Martin Shuster in Adorno in Context, Conference, Frankfurt School, General, Links of Interest, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Jon Catlin, Fumi Okiji, and Eric Oberle have written to us asking us to post about a series of seminars they will be curating around Adorno and Identity. More details are below:

Facebook event: https://www.facebook.com/events/689345985085105

Negative dialectics, the critical theorist Theodor Adorno wrote, “is suspicious of all identity.” The concept of identity and its negations—nonidentity and negative identity—are woven throughout Adorno’s wide-ranging corpus. This interdisciplinary series of virtual seminars on “Adorno and Identity,” convened by Jonathon Catlin (Princeton), Eric Oberle (Arizona State), and Fumi Okiji (Berkeley), revisits Adorno’s thought at a moment in which political, cultural, legal, and psychological notions of identity have expanded relevance and vexed public meaning. Across these sessions, scholars from diverse fields will return to Adorno’s theoretical framework in order to collectively develop more robust notions of identity, nonidentity, and negative identity, and to advance critical theory by connecting Adorno’s work to broader conversations about identity in adjacent fields, including the study of race, gender, sexuality, and technology.

This series of virtual seminars will meet on Zoom every two weeks over the course of the spring 2021 semester, beginning Friday, Jan. 29 (1–3pm Eastern US time). Each session will consist of two parts: three presentations of approximately 15 minutes each, followed by an hour of discussion amongst the participants and a public audience. On our Facebook event page you will find our current schedule. Please email jonathon.catlin@gmail.com to be kept up to date with sessions through our email list. A Zoom link and outlines of the presentations will be provided on our website prior to the first session.

Current schedule:

Introduction to Adorno and Identity: Adorno, Du Bois, and negative identity (Jan. 29, 2021, 1–3pm EST)
Jonathon Catlin, Eric Oberle, and Fumi Okiji

Rethinking Adorno and race, part 1: Revisiting Du Bois and critical race theory (Feb. 12)
Corey D. B. Walker – “The Wound of Blackness: Thinking Adorno and the Limits of Critical Theory”
Oshrat Silberbusch – “‘The World Thus Darkly Through the Veil’: Reflections on Identity (Thinking) with Du Bois and Adorno”
Charlotte Baumann – Adorno, Suffering & Critical Race Theory: Or, The Non-identical & the System

Rethinking Adorno and Race, part 2: Freedom through fugitivity and negation (Feb. 26)
Henrike Kohpeiß – “Identity Produced by Negation: Freedom after Theodor Adorno and Saidiya Hartman”
Romy Opperman – “Critical Black Feminist Theory”
Anders Bartonek – “Marronage and Non-identity”

Rethinking Adorno and race, part 3: Fanon, racisms, and the question of praxis (March 12)
Martin Shuster – “Adorno and Fanon on Antisemitism”Sid Simpson and Ryan Curnow – “Stripping Away the Masks of Identity: Adorno and Fanon’s Negative Dialectics”

Adorno and the politics of non-identity (March 26)
Frank Müller – “Reflections on the Politics of Nonidentity”
Ariane Mintz – “Unveiling the ‘Individualistic Veil’: On Narcissistic Reactions to Capitalist Mutilations”
Claudia Leeb – “The Feminist Subject-in-Outline’s Fight against the Extremist Right”

Adorno and queer dis/identification (April 9)
Asaf Angermann – “Queer Utopia and the Incommensurable: Adorno after Muñoz”
Kyle Kaplan – “Dear Adorno: On the Limits of Personal and Practical Advice”
Nicole Yokum – “The Politics of Avoidance: From Adornian Coldness to Edelmanian Antisociality”

Identity thinking, data, and the politics of algorithmic personalization (April 23)
Moira Weigel – An Adornian critique of algorithmic identity, machine learning, and personalization
Jerome Clarke – “Battle of Negroes in a Black Box: Nonidentity and Race Data”
Samir Gandesha – “Adorno’s Critique of Identity Thinking: Between the Abstract and Concrete”

Nietzsche and Adorno on Philosophical Praxis, Language, and Reconciliation: Towards an Ethics of Thinking

31 Thursday Dec 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in General, Links of Interest, Publications, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Paolo A. Bolaños has written to us about his recent new book, Nietzsche and Adorno on Philosophical Praxis, Language, and Reconciliation: Towards an Ethics of Thinking, to be published by Rowman & Littlefield shortly. Here is the publisher’s description:


Nietzsche and Adorno on Philosophical Praxis, Language, and Reconciliation: Towards an Ethics of Thinking
 offers a philosophical notion of an “ethics of thinking,” a kind of thinking that is receptive to the non-identical character of the world of human and non-human objects. Paolo A. Bolaños experiments with the ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche and Theodor W. Adorno, who are presented as contemporary proponents of the Frühromantik tradition. Bolaños offers a reconstruction of the respective philosophies of language of Nietzsche and Adorno, as well as a rehearsal of their critique of metaphysics and identity thinking, in order to develop a notion of philosophical praxis that is grounded in the ethical dimension of thinking. Via Nietzsche and Adorno, Bolaños argues that thinking’s performative participation in uncertainty broadens the domain of reason, thereby also broadening our conceptual capacities and our receptivity to new possibilities of thinking. As an ethical praxis, thinking guards itself from the error of solidification, thereby opening philosophy to a reconciliatory, as opposed to domineering, reception of the world.

Institute for Advanced Dialectical Research

31 Thursday Dec 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in General, Links of Interest

≈ Leave a comment

Moira MacKenzie, the communications coordinator for the newly established Institute for Advanced Dialectic Research wrote to us with the following press release:

Thinking Positively about the Power of Negative Thinking
World’s first Dialectical Research Institute Established on World Philosophy Day

SEATTLE, Washington — Philosopher Herbert Marcuse described dialectic as “the power of negative thinking,” but that hasn’t stopped the founders of the newly-established Institute for Advanced Dialectical Research from thinking positively about their new endeavor. They chose World Philosophy Day (Nov. 19) during a worldwide pandemic to launch the world’s first institute dedicated to dialectical thinking … and they think the timing couldn’t be better.

“One thing we’ve learned from the response to the is that we aren’t limited to interacting with people locally or at big conferences in far-away places,” says Jersey Flight, the institute’s Director of Interdisciplinary Research. Discussion groups, book clubs, lectures, even those big conferences, he notes, have all moved online. “Connecting from quarantine has taught us that distance is no longer a barrier to intellectual engagement and collaboration, whether it’s with people in our own neighborhoods or in other countries around the world.” Dealing with the virus has been challenging for everyone, Flight says, “but it has also created unexpected opportunities for forging fruitful partnerships and developing dialectical thinking.”

Dialectic is one of the oldest branches of philosophy—with roots in ancient Greece, China and India—but its modern form begins with the 19th century German philosopher, G.W.F. Hegel, who showed how our thoughts and experience can develop through a process of contradiction and negation that leads to higher levels of thinking and awareness.

“Dialectic is relevant in a surprisingly wide variety of fields,” says Executive Director, Justin Burke, DPhil, “from philosophy and psychology to physics and linguistics, but it’s rarely studied in its own right.” Dr. Burke, who did his doctoral research on Hegel at Oxford, recalls, “As a student, I used to think of dialectic in purely philosophical terms, but I’ve come to understand what Hegel meant when he said it’s all around us.”

Several years ago, after a lecture, someone in the audience asked Dr. Burke about Hegel and Martin Luther King. “I had to admit I wasn’t aware of a link between them,” he says. “Later, I was surprised to find that Dr. King had written about Hegel and dialectic in his autobiography.” And King wasn’t the only one—Dr. Burke says he discovered that Nobel Prize-winning physicists have written about dialectic: Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli and Werner Heisenberg; there are dialectical biologists, psychologists and sociologists; there is a journal of Dialectical Anthropology; there are emerging fields of dialect, such as neurodialectics and dialectical linguistics. There are also established disciplines, such as dialectical education and Critical Theory, plus non-western traditions, including Chinese, Indian and Russian dialectics. Considered as a group, Dr. Burke says, “There are dozens of potential areas ripe for research and, hopefully, the propagation of dialectical thinking.”

To carry out this research, the institute has established an international forum—the first of its kind—for discussion and debate about dialectic under headings such as “Hegelian Dialectics”, “Quantum Mechanics” and “Dialectical Psychology”. In another first, the institute has also launched a journal of dialectical research, and will organize an annual symposium on dialectic.

New Book: Critical theory and demagogic populism

18 Wednesday Nov 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in Critical Theory, Frankfurt School, Links of Interest, Publications

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Demagogue, Frankfurt School, Populism, Trumpism

Paul Jones has written to us announcing the publication of his new book, Critical Theory and Demagogic Populism (Manchester University Press, 2020).

Here is the publisher’s blurb for the book:

Populism is a powerful force today, but its full scope has eluded the analytical tools of both orthodox and heterodox ‘populism studies’. This book provides a valuable alternative perspective. It reconstructs in detail for the first time the sociological analyses of US demagogues by members of the Frankfurt School and compares these with contemporary approaches. Modern demagogy emerges as a key under-researched feature of populism, since populist movements, whether ‘left’ or ‘right’, are highly susceptible to ‘demagogic capture’. The book also details the culture industry’s populist contradictions – including its role as an incubator of modern demagogues – from the 1930s through to today’s social media and ‘Trumpian psychotechnics’. Featuring a previously unpublished text by Adorno on modern demagogy as an appendix, it will be of interest to researchers and students in critical theory, sociology, politics, German studies, philosophy and history of ideas, as well as all those concerned about the rise of demagogic populism today.

Under the Dome: Paul Celan at 100

16 Monday Nov 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in Conference, Critical Theory, General, Links of Interest

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Critical Theory, Paul Celan

Robert Kaufman wrote to us about this event on 11/23/20 at 6pm (PCT). Featuring Judith Butler, Mary Ann Caws, Norma Cole, Jean Daive, Philip Gerard, Fady Joudah, Myung Mi Kim, D.S. Marriott, Michael Palmer, Doris Salcedo, Timothy Snyder, Roberto Tejada, Rosmarie Waldrop, and Raúl Zurita, and moderated by Robert Kaufman.

Click here for more details.

CfP: Adorno and Identity

31 Monday Aug 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in Adorno Studies (journal), Call for Papers, Frankfurt School, Publications, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Black thought, Non-Identity

Jonathon Catlin asked us to share the following call for papers:

CfP: Adorno and Identity – Virtual Workshop and Special Issue of Adorno Studies

A virtual workshop on “Adorno and Identity,” with papers intended for publication in a special issue of the journal Adorno Studies, is now accepting abstracts from potential contributors.

Negative dialectics, Theodor Adorno wrote, “is suspicious of all identity.” Nevertheless, identity is one of the central concepts linking together Adorno’s wide-ranging corpus. This issue pursues a timely and interdisciplinary revisitation of the notions of identity, the nonidentical, and negative identity in Adorno, prompted by several recent studies: Eric Oberle’s Theodor Adorno and the Century of Negative Identity, Fumi Okiji’s Jazz As Critique: Adorno and Black Expression Revisited, and Oshrat Silberbusch’s Adorno’s Philosophy of the Nonidentical: Thinking as Resistance. These works serve as a common point of departure for revisiting Adorno’s thought at a moment in which identity has become a central and hotly debated concept. The goal of this issue is twofold: to use Adorno’s work to develop more conceptually robust and nuanced notions of identity and nonidentity, and to advance critical theory by connecting Adorno’s work to broader conversations about identity.

Continue reading →

New article: “Adorno’s Critique of the New Right-Wing Extremism: How (Not) to Face the Past, Present, and Future”

21 Friday Aug 2020

Posted by Martin Shuster in Publications, Theodor W. Adorno

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

extremism, right-wing

Harry Dahms wrote to us about the publication of his new article on Adorno’s recently published lecture course. You can find it here: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/disclosure/vol29/iss1/14/

Here’s the abstract:

This paper serves three purposes relating to a lecture Adorno gave in 1967 on “the new right-wing extremism” that was on the rise then in West Germany; in 2019, the lecture was published in print for the first time in German, to wide acclaim, followed by an English translation that appeared in 2020. First, it is important to situate the lecture in its historical and political context, and to relate it to Adorno’s status as a critical theorist in West Germany. Secondly, Adorno’s diagnosis of the new right-wing extremism (and related forms of populism) and his conclusions about how to resist and counteract it are relevant to the current political situation in the United States, even though he presented his analysis more than half a century ago. Thirdly, Adorno’s lecture provided the model for a type of education that is oriented toward enabling students to face unpleasant facts about modern social life in constructive ways, including recognizing and resisting right-wing populism and extremism, in an age that imposes greater and greater uncertainty and challenges on individuals. In conclusion, it is evident that in a rapidly changing world, the “tricks” of right-wing populists and extremists are astonishingly unoriginal and static, which in part may explain their appeal and effectiveness. Reading the pedagogy Adorno suggested as a practical application of his critical theory highlights the importance of enabling individuals to recognize the “normalcy” of proliferating experiences of cognitive dissonance, and to respond to such experiences by adopting a productive rather than defeatist stance with regard to the increasing complexity and the intensifying contradictions of modern societies in the twenty-first century, as they are accompanied by myriad possibilities and threats.

← Older posts

Categories

  • Adorno in Context
  • Adorno Studies (journal)
  • Association for Adorno Studies
  • Call for Papers
  • Conference
  • Conference Summary
  • Critical Theory
  • Frankfurt School
  • General
  • Interviews
  • Links of Interest
  • Publications
  • Theodor W. Adorno
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • June 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • January 2024
  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • August 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • March 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • August 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • November 2012
  • July 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
The Association for Adorno Studies gratefully acknowledges the support of the Institute for the Humanities at Simon Fraser University.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.