lea.gekle@u-picardie.fr<\/a>). A summary of each presentation (1 page) will be available this week-end in German and French for those who register. It will also be possible to take part in the discussion in English, as well as in German and French. Two extraordinary translators will help us manage to ensure that everyone feels at ease to participate. <\/p>\n\n\n\nEnglish: This two-day conference intends to throw light upon doctoral students \/ post-doc student\u2019s current research conducted in Germany and France, working in the area of German Critical Theory (first and second generation) from a philosophical and also <\/em>interdisciplinary point of view. “Interdisciplinarity” has now become somewhat of a buzzword in Europe. On the face of it, the term mostly refers to a certain idea of how disciplines are supposed to come to work with one another. But, in fact, the term has for some time now been quite often used as a part of the neoliberal narrative that accompanies the Bologna Process’s standardization and re-structuring of European university systems. Accumulating knowledge is, however, only one way of thinking about interdisciplinary. Disciplines are themselves complex bodies of knowledge that cannot simply be “linked” to others from the outside. Hence our question: what kind of interdisciplinarity does Critical Theory need in order to be able to formulate at the same time a contemporary critical theory of society ?
<\/p>\n\n\n\nFrench: Ces deux journ\u00e9es d\u2019\u00e9tude visent \u00e0 mettre en lumi\u00e8re les travaux en cours de doctorant-e-s et jeunes docteur-e-s allemand-e-s et fran\u00e7ais-e-s travaillant sur la th\u00e9orie critique d\u2019un point de vue philosophique mais dans une perspective interdisciplinaire. L\u2019interdisciplinarit\u00e9 est, d\u00e9sormais, sur toutes les l\u00e8vres. Mais elle est la plupart du temps \u00e9voqu\u00e9e dans un cadre particulier qui ne dit pas son nom : celui du processus de Bologne et de la restructuration n\u00e9olib\u00e9rale des universit\u00e9s europ\u00e9ennes. Contre ce type d\u2019interdisciplinarit\u00e9 qui se pense en tant qu\u2019accumulation de diff\u00e9rents savoirs sans se soucier de la mani\u00e8re de les articuler, nous nous posons la question suivante : comment penser aujourd\u2019hui, gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 la Th\u00e9orie Critique, une interdisciplinarit\u00e9 et une pluridisciplinarit\u00e9 qui ne soit pas un flatus vocis <\/em>formaliste, mais dont l\u2019approche inter- et pluri-disciplinaire permet l\u2019esquisse d\u2019une th\u00e9orie sociale contemporaine v\u00e9ritablement critique ?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Aur\u00e9lia Peyrical has written to us about a two-day German-French philosophy conference she is co-organizing with Lea Gekle. Here’s a …<\/p>\n
Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[7,8,1],"tags":[195,75,197,196],"class_list":["post-970","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conference","category-critical-theory","category-uncategorized","tag-aurelia-peyrical","tag-critical-theory","tag-interdisciplinarity","tag-lea-gekle"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/970","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=970"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/970\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":975,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/970\/revisions\/975"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=970"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=970"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=970"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}