{"id":329,"date":"2016-04-06T17:14:01","date_gmt":"2016-04-06T17:14:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/?p=329"},"modified":"2016-04-06T17:14:01","modified_gmt":"2016-04-06T17:14:01","slug":"new-book-by-martin-jay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/?p=329","title":{"rendered":"New book by Martin Jay"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.adornostudies.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c.jpg?ssl=1\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-330\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-330 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.adornostudies.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c.jpg?resize=200%2C300&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.adornostudies.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c.jpg?resize=200%2C300&amp;ssl=1 200w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.adornostudies.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c.jpg?resize=768%2C1152&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.adornostudies.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c.jpg?resize=683%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 683w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.adornostudies.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c.jpg?w=1800&amp;ssl=1 1800w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.adornostudies.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c.jpg?w=1058&amp;ssl=1 1058w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.adornostudies.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Jay-ReasonAfterItsEclipse-c.jpg?w=1587&amp;ssl=1 1587w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/history.berkeley.edu\/people\/martin-e-jay\" target=\"_blank\">Martin Jay<\/a> (UC-Berkeley) has a new book called\u00a0<em>Reason after its Eclipse: On Late Critical Theory\u00a0<\/em>(University of Wisconsin, 2016), that ought to be of interest to readers. Here&#8217;s a blurb on the book:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Martin Jay tackles a question as old as Plato and still pressing today: what is reason, and what roles does and should it have in human endeavor? Applying the tools of intellectual history, he examines the overlapping, but not fully compatible, meanings that have accrued to the term \u201creason\u201d over two millennia, homing in on moments of crisis, critique, and defense of reason.<\/p>\n<p>After surveying Western ideas of reason from the ancient Greeks through Kant, Hegel, and Marx, Jay engages at length with the ways leading theorists of the Frankfurt School\u2014Horkheimer, Marcuse, Adorno, and most extensively Habermas\u2014sought to salvage a viable concept of reason after its apparent eclipse. They despaired, in particular, over the decay in the modern world of reason into mere instrumental rationality. When reason becomes a technical tool of calculation separated from the values and norms central to daily life, then choices become grounded not in careful thought but in emotion and will\u2014a mode of thinking embraced by fascist movements in the twentieth century.<\/p>\n<p>Is there a more robust idea of reason that can be defended as at once a philosophical concept, a ground of critique, and a norm for human emancipation? Jay explores at length the communicative rationality advocated by Habermas and considers the range of arguments, both pro and con, that have greeted his work.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Martin Jay (UC-Berkeley) has a new book called\u00a0Reason after its Eclipse: On Late Critical Theory\u00a0(University of Wisconsin, 2016), that ought &hellip;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/?p=329\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[8,65,27,43,16],"tags":[2,75,85,84],"class_list":["post-329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-critical-theory","category-frankfurt-school","category-links-of-interest","category-publications","category-theodor-w-adorno","tag-adorno","tag-critical-theory","tag-habermasa","tag-martin-jay"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=329"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":331,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329\/revisions\/331"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.adornostudies.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}